In an era of unprecedented wealth concentration—where Canada's 61 billionaires control $324 billion amid record inequality—the 99% Reset movement proposes a non-violent strategy to redistribute power: a coordinated boycott of the Big Five banks (RBC, TD, Scotiabank, BMO, CIBC), which hold over 80% of retail deposits and financed $900 billion in fossil fuels since 2016.
This paper expands on the mechanism: A targeted $10 billion deposit outflow—achievable through mass switches to credit unions—triggers credit rating reviews by agencies like Moody's and S&P, prompting investigations by OSFI and FCAC.
These probes expose systemic risks tied to billionaire lending, fueling public and political momentum for wealth taxes, as evidenced by the NDP's 2025 platform (projected $94.5 billion over four years). Drawing on historical precedents like the Montgomery Bus Boycott (1955-1956) and recent U.S. deposit runs (SVB 2023), this cascade can unlock $30 billion annually in progressive revenue, funding co-ops, CLTs, and Citizens' Wealth Funds.
Projected timeline: 12-24 months to policy wins that fundamentally reshape Canadian finance.
Canada's financial system functions as the circulatory system of inequality, pumping capital from working families toward concentrated wealth. The Big Five banks—Royal Bank, TD, Scotiabank, BMO, and CIBC—command $6.5 trillion in total assets as of Q1 2025, including approximately $3-4 trillion in retail deposits extracted from ordinary Canadians' paychecks. This institutional dominance enables wealth hoarding through deliberate mechanisms: low-wage credit financing that traps workers in debt cycles, offshore tax haven facilitation hiding $682 billion in illicit wealth, and speculative real estate lending inflating housing costs beyond the reach of entire generations.
Household debt reached $18.2 trillion in Q3 2025—surpassing even 2008 levels when adjusted for inflation—while real median wages declined 2.1% year-over-year. Working families borrow to survive as capital accumulates upward. The Big Five profit from both sides of this extraction: charging interest on survival debt while investing deposits in assets that further concentrate wealth. This isn't market failure but market design, perpetuated through regulatory capture and political donations ensuring no meaningful reform threatens bank profitability.
The 99% Reset responds through Phase 1: Starve the parasite. Bank boycotts targeting $10 billion in deposit outflows—representing just 0.25-0.33% of Big Five deposits according to Forbes and StatsCan data—create strategic leverage far exceeding the nominal percentage. Financial markets operate on confidence and stability metrics monitored by credit agencies and regulators. Even modest deposit flight signals institutional vulnerability, triggering cascading reviews that expose systemic risks the banks prefer hidden. This isn't protest theater but precision economic intervention designed to destabilize the financial architecture enabling billionaire wealth accumulation.
The chain reaction: Boycott → Rating Review → Regulatory Probe → Policy Momentum
1. The Boycott: Engineering a $10 Billion Outflow
A bank boycott operates as precision economic warfare, not chaotic protest. Coordinated through #99ResetCA campaigns and local organizing hubs, participants systematically transfer deposits from Big Five accounts to democratic alternatives like Vancity Credit Union or Desjardins Group. These institutions grew assets 3.26% in Q1 2025 according to FSRA data, demonstrating capacity to absorb significant new deposits while maintaining cooperative governance structures. Unlike corporate banks optimizing shareholder returns, credit unions answer to member-owners who elect boards and determine investment priorities. Every dollar switched represents both withdrawal from extractive finance and investment in democratic alternatives.
The Montgomery Bus Boycott provides the historical template. From December 1955 through December 1956, Black residents of Montgomery, Alabama—representing 75% of bus ridership—maintained a complete boycott of the segregated transit system. The economic pressure cost the bus company approximately $3,000 per day (equivalent to $30,000 today), generating losses that forced the city to defend its segregation ordinances all the way to the Supreme Court. The Court's ruling desegregating buses resulted not from moral persuasion but economic unsustainability. Economic pressure, not legislative goodwill, produced structural change.
Credit union deposit growth simultaneously builds and destroys power. It constructs parallel democratic financial infrastructure capable of funding worker cooperatives, Community Land Trusts, and union organizing campaigns while starving Big Five banks of the capital enabling billionaire wealth extraction. The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions' 2024-2025 Annual Risk Outlook explicitly warns that "digitalization enables abrupt deposit outflows" through mobile banking apps processing instant transfers. Silicon Valley Bank's 2023 collapse demonstrated this vulnerability when $42 billion fled in hours once depositor confidence cracked. Canadian banks face identical systemic fragility, masked by oligopoly control and regulatory protections that a coordinated boycott exposes.
2. Credit Rating Review: The Domino Effect
Deposit outflows trigger immediate credit rating agency attention through automated monitoring systems tracking deposit betas—the sensitivity of funding stability to market stress. Standard & Poor's and Moody's maintain real-time surveillance of major Canadian banks, with quantitative models flagging any deposit flight exceeding normal variance. A $10 billion outflow over 12-18 months registers as statistically significant funding instability, initiating formal rating reviews that banks cannot prevent or control. These reviews become public record, signaling institutional vulnerability to bond investors, regulators, and competitors.
Laurentian Bank's 2022 near-failure demonstrates the cascade mechanism. Deposit flight triggered by pension fund shortfalls and management scandals prompted Moody's to downgrade the bank's credit rating, which automatically increased its borrowing costs and triggered additional deposit withdrawals in a self-reinforcing cycle. OSFI intervened with emergency oversight measures that stabilized the institution but permanently damaged its market position. Laurentian lost market share it never recovered. The Big Five face identical vulnerability if boycott-driven deposit flight breaches the thresholds credit agencies monitor, but scaled to institutions whose failure would threaten systemic stability—precisely the scenario regulators must prevent.
Climate risk exposure multiplies rating agency scrutiny. OSFI's B-15 climate risk guideline now requires credit agencies to incorporate fossil fuel exposure into bank ratings. The Big Five financed $131 billion in fossil fuel projects during 2024 according to InfluenceMap data—loans generating climate-related credit risks as carbon transition accelerates. Banks financing stranded assets while experiencing deposit flight face compounding vulnerabilities that rating downgrades would expose, potentially triggering the very funding crisis that justifies the downgrade. This reflexive dynamic creates strategic openings for boycott campaigns.
3. Regulatory Investigations: Institutional Pressure
Credit rating reviews summon the regulators. OSFI, per its 2024-2025 mandate, probes "liquidity shocks" through on-site examinations. A $10 billion outflow breaches early warning thresholds, triggering formal investigations.
In Canada, these probes will reveal uncomfortable truths: Big Five's uninsured deposits (~45%) and billionaire ties—like Thomson's $240M tax avoidance via Bermuda subsidiaries (C4TF 2025).
4. Policy Momentum: From Probes to Wealth Taxes
Regulatory investigations catalyze legislative reform. Exposés of billionaire-fueled risks align perfectly with the NDP's 2025 platform (1% wealth tax on net worth >$10M, projected $94.5B over 4 years). C4TF polling shows 89% public support for wealth taxes.
In Canada, momentum peaks when the NDP leverages minority government power for budget insertions. PBO estimates a wealth tax would yield $11-13B annually. Projected yield: $30B/year (NDP model + loophole closures), funding Phase 2 initiatives like 10K CLT units.
A $10 billion boycott is the spark that lights the fire. It destabilizes credit ratings, unleashes regulatory probes, and ignites wealth tax momentum—transforming $324B in billionaire wealth into democratic assets owned by the 99%.
Launch via 30-day actions: Switch your bank today. In 24 months, the 1% starves while the 99% builds ownership.
References: Bank of Canada (2025), C4TF (2025), IBISWorld (2025), NDP Platform (2025), OSFI Annual Risk Outlook (2024-2025), StatsCan (Q1 2025)
Take Action: Switch Your Bank | Read the Full Plan | Join a Chapter
